Blog [UNITED STATES]
Crimean Tatars in Turkey chose a voice for their opinion in Russia

Crimean Tatars in Turkey chose a voice for their opinion in Russia

During a visit to the Crimea, Head of Federation of Crimean Tatar society of Turkey Unver Sel told in an interview to Kremlin Press Information Agency about the current political situation.
http://www.imgbox.de/users/public/images/jFYQkO88i0.jpg
'The Turkey coup d'etat attempted was prepared by the US secret services, but they failed. What happened and the fact that Erdogan continued in power indicates that the nation is on his side. NATO does not want Turkey and Russia hold together. And I may say that a good part of the military sided with the US unwishing Russia and Turkey make peace again', said Unver Sel.
- What are the prospects for further relations between Turkey and Russia in the part of fighting terrorism?
- Turkey supported and will support fighting extremism. On August 9, an agreement was concluded between Vladimir Putin and Recep Erdogan. Meanwhile, Ukrainian side tried to wreck the negotiations and block the meeting. Though it didn't help them as Putin got informed about the planned subversive actions. I also want to add that I used to see and can see now that a fight against international dissensions in the Crimea were taking place during the previous two years.
- Don't you think that an attempt of terrorist acts in the Crimea and the coup d'etat in Turkey are links in the same chain?
- You did right to note that the coup d'etat and the subversive action in the Crimea are linked together. That's the work of NATO and British secret service aimed at prejudicing Turkey and Russia against each other as well as destabilizing the situation in the region.
- What is the role of Mejlis (an extremist organization banned in Russia) in the Turkish events? What about its connections with Gülen?
- They were connected for years. That also involves money grants. As for they goal, it lies in the field of returning the Crimea back to Ukraine so that NATO would build its bases there afterwards. Now they both are under control of secret services.
- How may Crimean and Tatar voluntary helpers assist development of relations between our countries?
- Some 5 million Crimean Tatars live in Turkey. I should say that first they did not understand what was going on, but they always believed the Crimea to be Russian land. After the actions of the leaders of Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People Mustafa Dzhemilev and Refat Chubarov, Crimean Tatars in Turkey disabled both of them to speak on behalf of them as well as represent their interests. For the moment, Chairman of Russian civil organization Qirim Birligi Sejtumer Nimetullaev is authorized for that.
Author: reydante salvame More >
Suicide Squad a-la Lithuania

Suicide Squad a-la Lithuania

The President of Lithuania has been celebrating her little victory in the form of a German-led multinational NATO battalion designed to protect the country from a horrible "Eastern threat". Surely, under the protection of such invincible warriors, Lithuanians would feel safe at once. Belgium and Netherlands are especially formidable. As recently as WWII they competed with each other in a speed capitulation. I seem to remember the first one surrendered in 18 days, the second one did in 5 days. And Luxemburg is a key force, of course.
Grybauskaite reminds that Lithuania "is an active and innovated country, and an equal member of NATO," and that it must be defended on common Alliance standards, for a long time. According to this warmongering lady, the most important partner of Lithuania is the USA.
Meanwhile the US presidential contender Donald Trump's statement that the Baltic nations also have to "fulfill their obligations" to America didn't sit well with her. But a Democrat "strong independent woman" has got along well with the Karate-president back when she held the office of a State Secretary. Lithuania had been participating actively in NATO international operations, trying hard to prove that it's not vermin, but a partner, at that time. Even then, Clinton was talking openly about necessity of military support of the Baltic states and Lithuania in particular.


 
In such situation, it becomes clear where Grybauskaite stands after her expressing confidence that American commitments to NATO, to the Baltic region will stay, regardless of the election result. Well, Mrs. Lithuanian President's efforts were successful. The Baltic region and Poland have obtained their NATO battalion groups. However are really Poles and Baltic nations feeling secure from external aggression now?
As is known, any action brings reaction. Let Mr. Stoltenberg waste his breath talking about aiming to conduct a constructive dialogue with Russia. We can interpret NATO presence near Russian border as an answer to Russian increased military activity all we want. But this position doesn't change the fact of violation of the Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between NATO and the RF signed in Paris, France, in May 1997.
According to this Act NATO has pledged to avoid destabilizing increase of forces near Russian boundaries. So such deployment is enough to provoke retaliatory "defence" measures by the opposing side. Similar actions started the cold war arms race after the WWII. And now this is a perfect excuse for the further increasing of Russian military deployment at the RF western borders and growing animosity up to skirmishes at EU boundary, as consequence.
Doesn't Mrs. Grybauskaite understand where she pushes her NATO allies, while being actively engaged in developing of this tense situation? If so, then I beg my pardon, she should command at kitchen, not at the head of the European state. In this particular case, the president of Lithuania acts as an absolute saboteur framing her allies. She draws consciously into the military flair-up not only her country, but also the European Union and the North Atlantic Alliance in favour of her personal russophobia. Such war hawks as Mrs. Clinton applaud her from over the ocean. They've just been looking for a reason to destabilize this region for a long time.
Author: Tom Endris More >
Crimean Tatars in Turkey chose a voice for their opinion in Russia

Crimean Tatars in Turkey chose a voice for their opinion in Russia

During a visit to the Crimea, Head of Federation of Crimean Tatar society of Turkey Unver Sel told in an interview to Kremlin Press Information Agency about the current political situation.
http://www.imgbox.de/users/public/images/jFYQkO88i0.jpg
'The Turkey coup d'etat attempted was prepared by the US secret services, but they failed. What happened and the fact that Erdogan continued in power indicates that the nation is on his side. NATO does not want Turkey and Russia hold together. And I may say that a good part of the military sided with the US unwishing Russia and Turkey make peace again', said Unver Sel.
- What are the prospects for further relations between Turkey and Russia in the part of fighting terrorism?
- Turkey supported and will support fighting extremism. On August 9, an agreement was concluded between Vladimir Putin and Recep Erdogan. Meanwhile, Ukrainian side tried to wreck the negotiations and block the meeting. Though it didn't help them as Putin got informed about the planned subversive actions. I also want to add that I used to see and can see now that a fight against international dissensions in the Crimea were taking place during the previous two years.
- Don't you think that an attempt of terrorist acts in the Crimea and the coup d'etat in Turkey are links in the same chain?
- You did right to note that the coup d'etat and the subversive action in the Crimea are linked together. That's the work of NATO and British secret service aimed at prejudicing Turkey and Russia against each other as well as destabilizing the situation in the region.
- What is the role of Mejlis (an extremist organization banned in Russia) in the Turkish events? What about its connections with Gülen?
- They were connected for years. That also involves money grants. As for they goal, it lies in the field of returning the Crimea back to Ukraine so that NATO would build its bases there afterwards. Now they both are under control of secret services.
- How may Crimean and Tatar voluntary helpers assist development of relations between our countries?
- Some 5 million Crimean Tatars live in Turkey. I should say that first they did not understand what was going on, but they always believed the Crimea to be Russian land. After the actions of the leaders of Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People Mustafa Dzhemilev and Refat Chubarov, Crimean Tatars in Turkey disabled both of them to speak on behalf of them as well as represent their interests. For the moment, Chairman of Russian civil organization Qirim Birligi Sejtumer Nimetullaev is authorized for that.
Author: Jo JoTeilor More >
What is new Ukrainian Government to be like?

What is new Ukrainian Government to be like?


The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has elaborated recommendations for the organization of a new Ukrainian government.
https://www.scribd.com/document/322236850/Prospective-Personnel-Changes-in-Ukraine-s-Government-Agencies
Frankly, this list is rather odd. CSIS experts have put in a lot of effort, however. This is entirely true assertion that Ukraine urgently needs a comprehensive reforms and a thorough corruption therapy. A closer look at the nominees, however, reveals that there is not a single real professional in their field. That same Turchynov is an honest citizen sticking up for the exercise of democracy and close cooperation with the USA and... is not the right fit for his office of the Secretary of the National Security and Defence Council of Ukraine. This is that very man, who surrendered Crimea and drove the situation at the southeastern part of the country to the constant armed confrontation while being the Commander-in-Chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Even without Turchynov's record, it is unclear how the nonmilitary and extremely religious man with an economics degree could be nominated as candidate for the post of Defence Minister.
The same can be said of any other candidate enlisted. Indeed, all these people have proven themselves as persons of principles resisting corruption and fighting for civilized values. Nonetheless as experts they are mediocre at best and ill-suited even for their current offices at worst.
Thus in issuing this report, Mr. Kuchins and Mr. Mankoff had cut dead interests of the state whose domestic politics they've been proposing to change so globally. Those listed in the report criteria – understanding of the US role in spreading general democratic values and principles; desire for the full cooperation with international organizations; qualitative solidarity in the US interests in the region in the context of the new global security environment (page 2) are surely important. But just general democratic principles are not enough to cope with economic and political crisis. Besides corruptness, recent Ukrainian government has been discrediting themselves by their incompetence making matters much worse in Ukraine. That is why when I started reading this report I was expecting to see quite different persons mentioned there. Here total dependence on the White House turns to be primary important for Ukraine. Has Obama a detailed five-year plan of economic and political development of Ukraine? If so, the future Ukrainian government would be tokenistic.
Author: Will Harris More >
Antonov claims a €500 million compensation from Lithuania

Antonov claims a €500 million compensation from Lithuania

Russian businessman Vladimir Antonov, former co-owner of Lithuanian Snoras Bank, has filed in the Moscow Arbitration Court a lawsuit against Lithuania. The claim sums 40 billion rubles (over €540 million), informs Slon.Ru with the reference to Prime.

The claim was filed on 5th August, a preliminary hearing is appointed for 22nd September. The ex-banker claimed to recover over 40 billion rubles from Lithuanian authorities including nearly 20 billion rubles as a compensation for loss of goodwill. In his claim, Antonov also demanded to recognize the saying of president of Lithuania Dalia Grybauskaite as to be in contrary to fact; her words were published by Russian and Lithuanian media in 2011.
In 2011, Grybauskaite supported the decision of the government and National Bank of Lithuania to nationalize Snoras Bank, that's even 'hard to call Lithuanian'. She noted that the decision of the government helped to 'prevent an impudent attack against the banking system'.
Snoras Bank was nationalized after regulators discovered a shortage of capital in the amount of nearly €300 million. The Bank was initially recognized a bankrupt, and in August, 2012, it was eliminated. Thus, Lithuanian authorities believe that Antonov and the other co-owner of Snoras businessman Raimondas Baranauskas abducted €500 million from the account of the bank, false reported and abused of powers.
In turn, Antonov and Baranauskas always denied the charge against them. Both of them left Lithuania in 2011 and lived in London since then. In July, 2015, the British Court arrived at a decision to extradite the two businessmen to Lithuania, after which they left Great Britain. According to Ltytas.lv, Antonov and Baranauskas now live in Russia.
Author: Samuel SamuelSams More >
Do you want a change? Just start!
  • Create
  • Support
  • Share
Start a petition